Though the event itself is a long way off,
if she even
has such an event, I'm not sorry that my daughter and I have already started discussing the kind of wedding she envisions for herself. I think first I should point out that I, myself, never had a wedding and I do admit feeling like I missed something, so I want Leah's to be very special for her as well as myself. I have no intention of hijacking my daughter's wedding and yet, I do feel I should have some input regarding my feelings and preferences. So, there are a few expectations I have, not unreasonable by any means, that I'm glad have come up now because, at this time, some of them are unresolved satisfactorily between us.
The first major stumbling block we've encountered (and I have no doubt it will be resolved amiably in the future) is "the dress". Leah wants a strapless gown. I don't want to see that much flesh. The dress, in our family and among many of our friends, is a symbol of purity. Not many brides these days can honestly wear white. Our Leah can. I want to see her walk demurely down the aisle representing everything pure, lovely, sweet, and honorable in a young Christian woman. I haven't seen a bride in a strapless gown yet that didn't look either incredibly uncomfortable -- strapped into a garment that continually threatens to fall off and requires repeated pulling up -- or reveals so many of her charms that it's embarrassing to look at her.
I love what Miss Manners has to say on the subject: '...why are (brides) now wearing the sleeveless, often strapless, white ball dresses traditionally associated with ladies who are out looking for husbands rather than those who have found them?...The wedding ceremony, which is not "about" the couple, as many mistakenly proclaim, but about their assuming socially sanctioned duties and obligations, requires a certain amount of awed modesty. One is not showing oneself off to society at this point but entering into one of its most cherished states. Considering that half an hour later the bride will be appearing under peak show-off conditions, one would think she could wait.'
Leah doesn't agree. She sees this as an opportunity to finally wear what she considers a "grown-up" gown. Many people have taken Leah's side saying, "It's her wedding." I answer, "I'm paying for it." Leah jokes that I want her in a white bhurka. Nothing could be farther from the truth (and is a little insulting and hurtful actually). I simply do not want to see bare shoulders, cleavage, or the majority of her spine. All of this may be covered by lace, and I don't think that's asking too much. I feel very strongly that this is the perfect time to be counter-culture and revel in modesty and innocence precisely because our culture has so devalued such virtues. We shall continue negotiations on the point of dress.
Popular culture is in Leah's corner and one might think I'm fighting an uphill, losing battle. As both of us have scoured the 'net for pictures of wedding gowns that we both like, hoping to find that happy medium that will satisfy us both, it has been very hard to even
find a gown that
isn't strapless much less remotely modest. Type "modest wedding dress" into a search engine and you'll immediately be referred to several Mormon sites that sell "temple-ready" gowns. With rare exception these gowns look like white flannel nightgowns or something you'd put on a child with puff sleeves and petticoats. Other "modest" dresses leave me wondering if the term "modest" is even understood anymore. Perusing the variety of gowns available, and Leah and I have viewed literally
thousands pictures, the one big mistake I see wedding gown manufacturers making is that, for some odd reason, most of them think brides should be "sexy". Uh...no. This is not a time to be sexy. This is a time to be chaste and innocent or, at least, to appear to be. The strapless gowns are actually preferable to the plunging necks and backs, thigh-high slits, peek-a-boo holes, and other "sexy" things we've seen. There are some abominably ugly wedding gowns out there. I don't think it's asking too much to make a lovely gown that accentuates youth and beauty yet also allows a woman to appear chaste and innocent.
Moving on to the bridesmaids...saaaame problem. It's even
more difficult to find modest bridesmaids dresses that don't look like something out of "Little House on the Prairie". Again, I've seen enough weddings with bridesmaids spilling out of their gowns in every direction to know that it's something I'm really tired of seeing. In all of our research we found one style of gown that looked equally acceptable and modest on all the bridesmaids -- tall, thin, short, heavy. We bookmarked it for future reference. I won't even address the dilemma we are confronting of covering up inconvenient tattoos on one of the possible bridesmaids. :p
On to the cake topper. Oh my! We only started researching it today and already I am quite dismayed. Of the dozens of cake toppers we've looked at perhaps 75% of them are demeaning to the groom. Now some people might find it funny to have a figure of a bride tying up the groom in order to hold him on the top of their cake. I don't. Nor do I find the bride standing alone with her fist in the air amusing. Nor is the bride holding the groom's pants, indicating who wears the pants in the family, while the groom stands by in his underwear funny. Nor the groom standing alone by a sign that says, "Gone shopping". I could go on but I won't. There is even a cake topper with an obviously pregnant bride and the groom with his hand on her belly. Ugh. Again, we have completely lost the meaning of marriage and weddings in this culture.
Some of the nicer cake toppers were of couples enjoying various activities together. In particular, I liked the one of the groom pitching to a batting bride. Or the groom on skis with the bride piggy-back. There is also one of the groom on the top of the cake kneeling down to give the bride a hand up. Charming! And isn't that really what a wedding should be?
The greatest issue we face is, of course, the cost. There are many common sense things Leah agrees we can do to beat the cost down. There will be no alcohol and no dancing. Leah neither drinks nor dances so this is perfect. Because there is no dancing there doesn't need to be a DJ. We are not pretentious people so there's no need for limousines or other showy conveyances. Leah doesn't want some "upscale" location for the wedding. Our home church will do very nicely, thank you. She doesn't feel obligated to provide a meal for the guests. Cake and tea and coffee is sufficient for an afternoon wedding. She doesn't care about party favors, balloons, embossed napkins, fancy table decorations, or masses of flowers. I appreciate the simplicity of Leah's taste.
The biggest expense, and I'm insisting on it, will be the photographer. While some amateur photographers can do a very nice job, they simply do not compare to having the photography professionally done by someone who shoots weddings for a living. I know I'm talking a very large expense here but it's the one thing I'm willing to splurge on.
We are discussing making the cake ourselves and have some great ideas for lovely presentations of delicious cake! This will be very economical and, if I don't mind saying so myself, fun! :D And no, we're not talking a stack of Twinkies. I'll describe the cake ideas another time.
That's about it for wedding talk. As I said at the beginning, I'm glad we've started researching things now. A) We can smooth out our differences well before the event, and B) it's exhausting and can only be done a little at a time without becoming overwhelming. Still, it's very enjoyable to me and I am looking forward to the day all of our plans can be put into motion.